1. (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻

    flipping tables, flipping fucking tables

    flipping tables, flipping fucking tables

    flipping tableeees!!


    tags:  ragequittheinternet 

  2. I want to note though that while it’s always been the case that a whole lot of money gets poured into providing better wine glass holders for limousines, and sometimes the underlying innovative creativity, however scant, of those getting such paychecks bursts through the seams of their intended role in a truly disruptive manner and makes it harder and harder for institutions of oppression dependent upon certain rigidities and simplicities to maintain themselves. But it’s typically been the case that the big disruptions come from those who weren’t being funded explicitly to create within the lines, who were figuring out shit not for profit but for idealisms, for the sake of understanding and greater capacity to engage with the world, or for the sake of greater latitude from and resistance to confining social dynamics.

    tags:  disruption  creativity  idealism  resistance  reimagining the world 

  3. …when women speak truly they speak subversively—they can’t help it: if you’re underneath, if you’re kept down, you break out, you subvert. We are volcanoes. When we women offer our experience as our truth, as human truth, all the maps change. There are new mountains. That’s what I want—to hear you erupting. You young Mount St. Helenses who don’t know the power in you—I want to hear you.
    — Ursula K. Le Guin

    tags:  women  truth  subversion  power 

  4. There seems to be a massive focus on “impact” with most of the focus on the quantity and reach of that impact and little regard for quality. I fear that for many, impact has become a buzzword that lets people openly state that they strive to be powerful, impressive or famous, without directly saying so, and while giving lip-service to social justice, without committing to anything. Impact is an empty word. As used today, the word “impact” is nearly equivalent to how the word “greatness” was used a hundred years ago. “Impact” is the latest silicon valley word for justifying a global male-dominated, ego-driven competition for greatness and recognition that is both counterproductive and outdated. The world needs humility and co-operation, not this ego-driven striving for impact. In the end, it does not matter so much where the change originates, or who gets credit. What matters is that we all work together toward more sustainable and equitable societies, to improve the lives off all humans and life on this planet.
    — Marc Juul <3

    tags:  impact  social justice  authenticity  humility 

  5. is it possible to share/work toward the long view of utopia yet simultaneously focus/act in the heterogeneity of the local and the present? are imagined communities at odds with the viscerality of our everyday interactions? how to connect the two? “be the tree, solve for bird.”


    tags:  cantsleep 

  6. Education is not knowledge. Nor is it the necessary means to acquire knowledge. Knowledge may arise just as readily from everyday life. Education is the organization of knowledge within the constraints of scarcity, under the sign of property. Educations turns the subjects who enter into its portals into objects of their class power, Functional elements who have internalized its discipline. Education turns those who resist its objectification into known and monitored objects of other regimes of objectification - the police and the soft cops of the disciplinary state. Education produces the subjectivity that meshes with the objectivity of commodified production. One may acquire an education, as if it was a thing, but one becomes knowledgeable through a process of transformation. Knowledge, as such, is only ever partially captured by education. Knowledge as a practice always eludes and exceeds it. “There is no property in thought, no proper identity, no subjective ownership.”
    — McKenzie Wark, A Hacker Manifesto, 2004:057
  7. It is our suffering that brings us together. It is not love. Love does not obey the mind, and turns to hate when forced. The bond that binds us is beyond choice. We are brothers in what we share. In pain, which each of us must suffer alone, in hunger, in poverty, in hope we know our brotherhood. We know it, because we have had to learn it. We know that there is no help for us but from one another, that no hand will save us if we do not reach out our hand. And the hand that you reach out is empty, as mine is. You have nothing. You possess nothing. You own nothing. You are free. All you have is what you are, and what you give.

    I am here because you see in me the promise, the promise that we made two hundred years ago in this city - the promise kept. We have kept it, on Anarres. We have nothing but our freedom. We have nothing to give you but our freedom. We have no law but the single principle of mutual aid between individuals. We have no government but the single principle of free association. We have no states, no nations, no presidents, no premiers, no chiefs, no generals, no bosses, no bankers, no landlords, no wages, no charity, no police, no soldiers, no wars. Nor do we have much else. We are sharers, not owners. We are not prosperous. None of us is rich. None of us is powerful. If it is Anarres you want, if it is the future you seek, then I tell you that you must come to it with empty hands. You must come to it alone, and naked, as the child comes into the world, into his future, without any past, without any property, wholly dependent on other people for his life. You cannot take what you have not given, and you must give yourself. You cannot buy the Revolution. You cannot make the Revolution. You can only be the Revolution. It is in your spirit, or it is nowhere.

    — The Dispossessed (1974), Ursula K LeGuin, p. 300-1
  8. You could say that the commons constitutes the great invisible sector of the economy and human society. Or as Illich would have put it, the commons is vernacular culture at work. It’s important to stress that the commons is not a resource. It’s a resource plus a community plus that community’s particular rules and norms for managing the resource. You could say that the commons is a socio-ecological-political-cultural paradigm and worldview.

    Let me also stress that the commons movement is not a utopian or ideological project. Nor is it about conventional politics or public policy. The commons is mostly about building working systems for meeting everyday needs outside of the market and state. It is practically minded and reality-based. It is a grassroots, do-it-yourself, take-charge-of-our-future kind of movement. Commoners are determined to open up new social and political spaces in which people can make their own rules, negotiate their own governance, and craft solutions that are tailored to their local circumstances.


    tags:  commons  DIY  reimagining the world 

  9. These nomads chart their courses by strange stars, which might be luminous clusters of data in cyberspace, or perhaps hallucinations. Lay down a map of the land; set a map of political change; over that, a map of the Net, especially the counter-Net with its emphasis on clandestine information-flow and logistics- and finally, over all, the 1:1 map of the creative imagination, aesthetics, values. The resultant grid comes to life, animated by unexpected eddies and surges of energy, coagulations of light, secret tunnels, surprises.
    — TAZ

    tags:  mapping  psychogeography 

  10. As a group moves into emptiness, a few of its members begin to share their own brokenness - their defeats, failures, doubts, fears, inadequacies and sins. They begin to stop acting as if they “had it all together” as they reflect on those things they need to empty themselves of. But the other members generally do not listen to them very attentively. Either they revert to attempts to heal or convert the broken members or else they ignore them by quickly changing the topic. Consequently those who have made themselves vulnerable tend to retreat quickly into their shells. It is not easy to confess your weakness when others are apt to try immediately to change you or else behave as if you haven’t said anything worth listening to.

    Sometimes the group by itself will come to recognize that it is blocking expressions of pain and suffering - that in order to truly listen they have to *truly* empty themselves, even of their distaste for “bad news.” If they don’t, it becomes necessary for me to point out to its members that they are discouraging the sharing of brokenness. Some groups will then immediately correct their callousness. But other groups toward the end of the stage of emptiness will wage their final last-ditch struggle against community. Typically, there will be a spokesman who will say, “Look, I have my own burdens at home. There’s no need to pay good money and spend a weekend just to take on more burdens. I’m all for this community business, but I don’t see why we have to focus so much on negative things all the time. Why can’t we talk about the good things, the things we have in common, our successes instead of our failures? I’d like this to be a joyful experience. What’s the point of community if it can’t be joyful?”

    Basically this final resistance is an attempt to flee back into pseudocommunity. But here the issue at stake is no longer whether individual differences will be denied. The group has moved too far for that. Instead the struggle is over wholeness. It is over whether the group will choose to embrace not only the light of life but also life’s darkness. True community *is* joyful, but it is also realistic. Sorrow and joy must be seen in their proper proportions.

    — The Different Drum: Community Making and Peace

    tags:  community  brokenness  vulnerability  wholeness 

powered by tumblr
theme by parker quinn